Regarding the relationship between pop music and politics, it is obvious that specific context and events emphasises the reception and impact maintained within society, and I believe this to be extremely fickle concerning matters to inspire change.
Ultimately it seems that an artist needs to have a hypocritical stance in order to create a following and express viewpoints, which fundamentally conform to the hegemony of the music industry.
Don’t get me wrong, there have been numerous attempts made by artists, which raise ‘both consciousness about and funds for political causes’ (Shuker) such as ‘band aid’ which ‘proved to be more successful than any of those involved had anticipated.’ (Street) However you have to question whether it’s the music or self serving performers that influenced impact.
It seems that if something will evoke moral panic, then politicians will enforce change, if only to maintain a certain ideology within today’s culture.
While I can see your point about self serving superstar performers, this post is rather confusingly expressed.
ReplyDelete